Former JAG lawyer: Only America ‘parses’ torture

 The United States has lost so much of its credibility and prestige on the world stage because of its heavy-handed interrogation tactics that President Bush’s insistence that US interrogators don’t torture holds as much water as “Iran denying it has a nuclear weapons program,” a retired Navy lawyer says.

There is a growing perception around the globe that the CIA’s alleged use of tactics such as waterboarding puts the US alongside some of the very regimes it is fighting in ignoring fundamental human rights. The latest valley of US credibility came this week when a Canadian government document put the US on a watch list of countries where prisoners could be tortured. Others on the list included Iran, Syria, China and Afghanistan.

Navy Lt. Cmdr Charles Swift, who defended Guantanamo Bay detainee Salim Ahmed Hamdan, said the Canadian document demonstrates the extent to which even the US’s closest allies are wary of its stance in the war on terror. He cited warnings from former Secretary of State Colin Powell and others that Guantanamo Bay needed to be closed to improve foreign relations.

“When they go into a diplomatic meeting … it’s the first thing on the agenda,” Swift said. “It starts to jeopardizes cooperation in intelligence gathering, police work, and ultimately potentially extradition and other issues.”

The Canadian training manual that warned of potential US torture mentioned Guantanamo Bay and invoked US interrogation practices such as “forced nudity, isolation and sleep deprivation,” although Canada’s foreign minister said the documents conclusions do not represent official government policy.

Swift said there were credible reports that those practices as well as waterboarding have been used by US interrogators, which is part of the reason the US has so little credibility.

“In the world community, it’s … like Iran denying they have a nuclear weapons program,” he said. “The question always is, ‘Well let us inspect it. Let us take a look at it.’ The country replies, ‘No no, that’s national security; we’re not going to do that.’ And people become suspect.”

Swift compared the US to other countries, “We may parse it legally, they are not in Europe or Canada or Great Britain. They call it for what it is, torture. This debate, which for us, continues politically in Congress is over in Europe. It’s over in Canada. We’re losing it there, it’s done.”

The video from MSNBC’s Countdown, broadcast January 17, 2008 is available here.

via//Raw Story

Posted in Attacks on Civilians, Bush Adminisration, Civil liberties and human rights, Defense, History, International Relations, Iraq War, Legal, Neocons, Politics, Reports/Studies/Books, United States, US Foreign Policy, War, War on Terror

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

Stats (July 2006-)
  • 149,239 unique hits
This site may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. This material is distributed without profit.
%d bloggers like this: